NCAA College Basketball, on Wednesday,
Score, Highlights
Short Preview
In what promises to be an exciting NCAA College Basketball matchup, the Stanford Cardinal basketball team will face off against the Clemson Tigers on February 4, 2026.
Based on recent form, the Clemson Tigers come into this game as the clear favorites, having won 4 of their last 5 matches. On the other hand, the Stanford Cardinal basketball team has only managed to win 1 of their last 5 games, indicating a slight dip in form.
In terms of bookmakers’ odds, the Clemson Tigers are given the edge with odds of 1.48, while the Stanford Cardinal have odds of 2.37. Our model prediction also leans towards the Clemson Tigers, giving them a 56.4% chance of securing an away win.
Both teams have shown tactical strengths in various aspects of their game, making it difficult to predict the outcome with certainty. It will be interesting to see how the Stanford Cardinal’s home advantage plays out against the Clemson Tigers’ recent run of good form. Expect an intense battle on the court with both teams giving their all to secure the win.
This preview is generated with the Welcome.Bet AI Insights Engine, combining form data, betting odds, and semantic SEO optimization to deliver relevant match analysis for fans and bettors alike from 2026-02-03T17:52:03+00:00.
| Stanford 36.6% |
Clemson 63.4% |
Outrights of NCAA College Basketball Clemson: 0.45%
!!!!! Information about video stream is absent for now
Betting Odds
| 1 | X | 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.55 | 1.45 | |||
| 2.37 | 1.48 | |||
| 2.66 | 1.45 |
Latest Results
| 31.01.26 Florida State Seminoles basketball – Stanford Cardinal basketball – 88:80 28.01.26 Miami FL Hurricanes basketball – Stanford Cardinal basketball – 79:70 24.01.26 Stanford Cardinal basketball – California Golden Bears basketball – 66:78 17.01.26 Stanford Cardinal basketball – Duke Blue Devils basketball – 50:80 14.01.26 Stanford Cardinal basketball – North Carolina Tar Heels basketball – 95:90 |
31.01.26 Clemson Tigers basketball – Pittsburgh Panthers basketball – 63:52 24.01.26 Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets basketball – Clemson Tigers basketball – 63:77 20.01.26 Clemson Tigers basketball – North Carolina State Wolfpack basketball – 76:80 OT 17.01.26 Clemson Tigers basketball – Miami FL Hurricanes basketball – 69:59 13.01.26 Clemson Tigers basketball – Boston College Eagles basketball – 74:50 |
Facts
Latest Head To Head
| 01.01.25 Clemson Tigers basketball – Stanford Cardinal basketball – 85:71 |
Standings
NCAA College Basketball Outrights
1. Arizona Wildcats: 5.15 (9.27%)
2. Michigan Wolverines: 5.69 (8.39%)
3. Michigan Tech: 5.75 (8.3%)
4. Duke Blue Devils: 7.7 (6.2%)
5. Houston Cougars: 12 (3.98%)
6. Connecticut Huskies: 14.4 (3.31%)
7. Illinois Fighting Illini: 15.2 (3.14%)
8. Iowa State: 16.8 (2.84%)
9. Florida Gators: 19 (2.51%)
10. Gonzaga Bulldogs: 20.6 (2.32%)
11. Kansas Jayhawks: 21 (2.27%)
12. Purdue Boilermakers: 22.2 (2.15%)
13. Nebraska Cornhuskers: 28.4 (1.68%)
14. Michigan State: 33.5 (1.42%)
15. Texas Tech: 35 (1.36%)
16. Vanderbilt Commodores: 36 (1.33%)
17. Michigan State Spartans W: 36 (1.33%)
18. Brigham Young: 43 (1.11%)
19. Alabama Crimson Tide: 45 (1.06%)
20. Arkansas State: 50 (0.95%)
21. Arkansas Razorbacks: 57.75 (0.83%)
22. Tennessee Volunteers: 64.2 (0.74%)
23. Louisville: 64.2 (0.74%)
24. St. Johns Sonics: 65 (0.73%)
25. St. Johns Red Storm: 71.5 (0.67%)
26. North Carolina: 76.2 (0.63%)
27. Virginia Cavaliers: 77.4 (0.62%)
28. Kentucky Wildcats: 80.2 (0.6%)
29. VCU Rams: 100 (0.48%)
30. Maryland Terrapins: 100 (0.48%)
31. South Carolina Gamecocks: 100 (0.48%)
32. Boise State: 100 (0.48%)
33. UC Irvine: 100 (0.48%)
34. Marquette: 100 (0.48%)
35. Dayton Flyers: 100 (0.48%)
36. Colorado State: 100 (0.48%)
37. High Point: 100 (0.48%)
38. Wake Forest: 100 (0.48%)
39. Memphis Tigers: 100 (0.48%)
40. Pittsburgh Panthers: 100 (0.48%)
41. Kansas State: 100 (0.48%)
42. Northwestern Wildcats: 100 (0.48%)
43. Notre Dame: 100 (0.48%)
44. Liberty: 100 (0.48%)
45. St. Marys (CA): 100 (0.48%)
46. Mississippi St.: 100 (0.48%)
47. McNeese State: 100 (0.48%)
48. Utah State: 100 (0.48%)
49. Georgia Tech: 100 (0.48%)
50. Oklahoma Sooners: 100 (0.48%)
51. Providence Friars: 100 (0.48%)
52. Santa Clara: 100 (0.48%)
53. Penn State: 100 (0.48%)
54. Yale: 100 (0.48%)
55. Oregon Ducks: 100 (0.48%)
56. Georgetown: 100 (0.48%)
57. Troy: 100 (0.48%)
58. Akron Zips: 100 (0.48%)
59. Saint Marys: 100 (0.48%)
60. Minnesota Golden Gophers: 100 (0.48%)
61. Florida State: 100 (0.48%)
62. Boston College: 100 (0.48%)
63. Saint-Louis: 100 (0.48%)
64. California Maritime: 100 (0.48%)
65. Georgetown Hoyas W: 100 (0.48%)
66. Miami Hurricanes W: 100 (0.48%)
67. Clemson: 105.2 (0.45%)
68. Iowa Hawkeyes: 105.2 (0.45%)
69. St. Louis Billikens: 106.5 (0.45%)
70. Auburn Tigers: 115.2 (0.41%)
71. UCF Knights: 120.2 (0.4%)
72. Wisconsin Badgers: 120.2 (0.4%)
73. UCLA: 120.2 (0.4%)
74. Georgia Bulldogs: 120.2 (0.4%)
75. NC State: 120.2 (0.4%)
76. Villanova Wildcats: 130.2 (0.37%)
77. SMU Mustangs: 130.2 (0.37%)
78. Texas Longhorns: 130.2 (0.37%)
79. Texas A&M: 130.2 (0.37%)
80. Miami (FL): 137.75 (0.35%)
81. Baylor Bears: 150.2 (0.32%)
82. Indiana Hoosiers: 150.2 (0.32%)
83. Ohio State Buckeyes: 150.2 (0.32%)
84. USC Trojans: 150.2 (0.32%)
85. Virginia Tech: 180.2 (0.26%)
86. TCU: 180.2 (0.26%)
87. Seton Hall Pirates: 180.2 (0.26%)
88. New Mexico: 180.2 (0.26%)
89. San Diego State: 180.2 (0.26%)
90. Stanford Cardinal: 180.2 (0.26%)
91. West Virginia: 230.2 (0.21%)
92. Butler Bulldogs: 230.2 (0.21%)
93. Missouri Tigers: 230.2 (0.21%)
94. LSU: 280.2 (0.17%)
95. Washington Huskies: 280.2 (0.17%)
96. Colorado: 280.2 (0.17%)
97. Utah Utes: 280.2 (0.17%)
98. Syracuse Orange: 280.2 (0.17%)
99. Xavier Musketeers: 280.2 (0.17%)
100. Creighton: 280.2 (0.17%)
101. Cincinnati Bearcats: 280.2 (0.17%)
102. DePaul Blue Demons: 280.2 (0.17%)
103. Oklahoma State: 280.2 (0.17%)
104. Arizona State: 280.2 (0.17%)
105. Miami (Ohio): 280.2 (0.17%)
106. California Golden Bears: 325.25 (0.15%)
107. Ole Miss Rebels: 325.25 (0.15%)
Stanford Cardinal – Clemson Tigers and other NCAA College Basketball events on our partner.
