Vitality Blast, on Sunday,
Score, Highlights
Short Preview
As Glamorgan County Cricket Club prepares to face Worcestershire County Cricket Club in the Vitality Blast on July 5, 2026, recent form suggests an intriguing matchup. Glamorgan has demonstrated impressive performance, winning 4 of their last 5 matches, showcasing a well-rounded team with strong batting depth and impactful bowling. Their recent success points towards effective strategies in both scoring and containment, making them a formidable opponent at home.
On the other hand, Worcestershire enters the match with a respectable record of 3 wins in their last 5 encounters. While they have shown resilience, they will need to refine their execution, particularly in the death overs, to compete successfully against a confident Glamorgan side.
Bookmakers currently favour Glamorgan with odds of 1.71 for a home win, reflecting their strong form, while Worcestershire’s odds at 2.06 suggest they are considered underdogs but not without a chance.
Our model predicts a 57.6% likelihood of a Glamorgan victory compared to a 42.4% probability for Worcestershire, highlighting a competitive landscape. As both teams seek to gain momentum in the league, fans can anticipate a thrilling contest, although no outcomes can be guaranteed.
This preview is generated with the Welcome.Bet AI Insights Engine, combining form data, betting odds, and semantic SEO optimization to deliver relevant match analysis for fans and bettors alike from 2026-07-04T01:52:02+00:00.
| Glamorgan 54.7% |
Worcestershire 45.3% |
Outrights of Vitality Blast Glamorgan: 4.86% Worcestershire: 3.59%
!!!!! Information about video stream is absent for now
Betting Odds
| 1 | X | 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.72 | 2.1 | |||
| 1.75 | 2.1 | |||
| 1.65 | 1.96 | |||
| 1.75 | 2.1 |
Latest Results
| 03.07.26 Glamorgan County Cricket Club – Warwickshire Birmingham Bears – 187:184 26.06.26 Glamorgan County Cricket Club – Middlesex County Cricket Club – 159:153 19.06.26 Glamorgan County Cricket Club – Surrey County Cricket Club – 555:552 12.06.26 Sussex County Cricket Club – Glamorgan County Cricket Club – 521:155 07.06.26 Lancashire County Cricket Club – Glamorgan County Cricket Club – 201:202 |
03.07.26 Worcestershire County Cricket Club – Kent County Cricket Club – 142:59 28.06.26 Worcestershire County Cricket Club – Somerset County Cricket Club – 180:144 26.06.26 Warwickshire Birmingham Bears – Worcestershire County Cricket Club – 224:165 19.06.26 Worcestershire County Cricket Club – Gloucestershire Gladiators – 475:474 12.06.26 Worcestershire County Cricket Club – Middlesex County Cricket Club – 265:339 |
Facts
Latest Head To Head
| 05.06.26 Worcestershire County Cricket Club – Glamorgan County Cricket Club – 168:141 22.08.25 Worcestershire County Cricket Club – Glamorgan County Cricket Club – 298:297 03.09.23 Worcestershire County Cricket Club – Glamorgan County Cricket Club – 284:170 04.08.23 Worcestershire County Cricket Club – Glamorgan County Cricket Club – 200:199 11.05.23 Glamorgan County Cricket Club – Worcestershire County Cricket Club – 340:336 |
Standings
Draw
Play Offs
Quarter-finals
| 1 | Lancashire (1) | Kent (4) | 156 : 153 |
| 2 | Somerset (2) | Warwickshire / Birmingham Bears (3) | 191 : 190 |
| 3 | Durham (2) | Hampshire (3) | 195 : 221 |
| 4 | Surrey (1) | Northamptonshire (4) | 147 : 154 |
Semi-finals
| 1 | Lancashire (1) | Somerset (2) | 159 : 182 |
| 2 | Hampshire (3) | Northamptonshire (4) | 155 : 158 |
Final
| 1 | Somerset (2) | Hampshire (3) | 195 : 194 |
Vitality Blast Outrights
1. Surrey: 5.5 (15.01%)
2. Northamptonshire: 6 (13.76%)
3. Hampshire: 6.5 (12.7%)
4. Nottinghamshire: 8.5 (9.71%)
5. Yorkshire: 9 (9.17%)
6. Essex: 13 (6.35%)
7. Lancashire: 17 (4.86%)
8. Gloucestershire: 17 (4.86%)
9. Somerset: 17 (4.86%)
10. Glamorgan: 17 (4.86%)
11. Worcestershire: 23 (3.59%)
12. Kent: 34 (2.43%)
13. Derbyshire: 34 (2.43%)
14. Durham: 34 (2.43%)
15. Warwickshire: 65.4 (1.26%)
16. Leicestershire: 65.4 (1.26%)
17. Middlesex: 180.2 (0.46%)
Glamorgan – Worcestershire and other Vitality Blast events on our partner.

0 Comment